Request a free quick check arrow_forward

MCP security quick check: see what your AI agents can really reach

Companies connect AI agents via MCP to DATEV, HR, CRM and more, and every connection is a door. We check which ones are open and whether that is legally compliant.

Request a free quick check arrow_forward
check_circle Free
check_circle Non-binding
check_circle Findings with actions
check_circle Legal assessment instead of tech jargon

Every agent is a door into your systems

AI agents and MCP servers give AI real access to production systems, and hardly anyone systematically checks how far that access reaches.

An MCP server no longer connects a language model just with text, but with real systems: DATEV, personnel files, CRM, databases, mailboxes. An agent can therefore read data, write data and trigger actions, automatically and within seconds.

Most teams have never systematically answered this: what can each individual agent actually reach? Can it leak sensitive data to the wrong place? Can a manipulated input trick it into actions nobody intended? And is what is technically possible even compatible with GDPR and professional secrecy law (§ 203 StGB, the German Criminal Code)?

As long as these questions are open, the attack surface is unknown, and what is unknown can be neither secured nor demonstrated to clients and supervisory bodies.

Five layers, one clear answer

We look at your MCP environment not only technically, but along all the layers that decide security and legal compliance.

account_tree

Inventory & attack surface

Which agents and MCP servers exist, which systems are they connected to, and what can each agent concretely reach as a result?

warning

Tool risks

Sensitive data exposure, destructive actions and indirect prompt injection: where could a tool do more than it should?

admin_panel_settings

Governance

Authentication, client separation and audit log: is it traceable who triggered what, and do the access boundaries hold?

inventory_2

Software supply chain

Known vulnerabilities in the dependencies and components in use: the gaps that are not in your own code.

gavel

Compliance mapping

Every finding is mapped against § 203 StGB, GDPR and the EU AI Act, so you know what is legally relevant.

summarize

Findings with actions

You receive the top findings prioritised and in plain language, with concrete steps for closing each gap.

A scanner shows the gap. We show what it means

Technical scanners are a tool, not an answer. They report that something is conspicuous, usually in English and in technical terms. You have to translate the rest yourself.

terminal Scanner only

  • remove Reports that a gap exists, technically and in English
  • remove No assessment under German law
  • remove Does not see governance gaps (client separation, audit log)
  • remove Assesses the software supply chain only superficially
  • remove Delivers a list, not an action plan

verified MCP security quick check

  • check_circle Translates every finding into German law (§ 203, GDPR, EU AI Act)
  • check_circle Says how to close each gap
  • check_circle Also covers governance and supply chain gaps
  • check_circle Understandable for management and partners
  • check_circle Prioritised findings instead of a raw error list

In three steps to findings

1

Submit a request

You request the quick check via the form and briefly describe your environment. We get back to you within one working day.

2

Quickcheck

We create an inventory of your agents and MCP servers and identify the most important findings along the five layers.

3

Findings discussion

We discuss the results, put them in legal context and give you concrete actions, in plain language and without obligation.

Relevant as soon as AI gets real access

corporate_fare

Companies

Mid-sized companies that use or plan to introduce AI agents or MCP servers, especially with connections to ERP, HR, CRM or databases.

balance

Tax and law firms (tax advisors / lawyers / auditors)

Tax advisors, lawyers and auditors, for whom any AI access to client data is bound by § 203 StGB and professional confidentiality obligations.

Request a free MCP security quick check

Briefly describe your environment. We will get back to you within one working day and agree the quick check with you.

Required field · Your data stays with Workflow Agentur. No sharing with third parties.

Thank you!

Thank you, your request has been received. We will get back to you within one working day. A confirmation of receipt is on its way by email.

Prefer to talk directly? Book your free initial call:

Book initial call →
info

The quick check is a technical readiness assessment, not legal advice and not a certificate or attestation. It provides indications and suggested actions for your own evaluation; a binding legal assessment remains with your tax or legal advisers.

Everything you need to know

What is an MCP security quick check?
A technical readiness assessment of your AI agents and MCP servers. We create an inventory of the connected systems, check what each agent can reach, and assess the most important risks along attack surface, tool risks, governance, software supply chain and compliance. You receive findings with concrete actions, not a certificate and not legal advice.
Is the quick check free and non-binding?
Yes. The quick check is our introductory offer and is non-binding. You receive an honest assessment of your situation, regardless of whether you continue working with us afterwards. For further support we prepare an individual proposal if needed.
How does the quick check differ from a technical scanner?
A scanner tells you that a gap exists, usually in English and purely technical. We translate every finding into German law (§ 203 StGB, GDPR, EU AI Act) and say how to close it. In addition there are gaps in governance and the software supply chain that a pure scanner does not see at all.
Who is the quick check for?
For companies and professional firms (tax advisors, lawyers, auditors) that already use AI agents or MCP servers or are planning to introduce them. Especially relevant when agents are connected to sensitive systems such as DATEV, HR or CRM.